Liberal MPs will join the fight against the controversial Quebec language bill CBC News:

A number of Liberal MPs from the Montreal area will take part in a rally on Saturday against the Quebec government’s plans to amend the French language charter.

Liberal MPs such as Anthony Hausfeiter and Annie Kotrakis point out that no federal ministers will join the march, while the Ottawa Liberals oppose Quebec’s 96th bill.

Organized by groups representing the state’s English-speaking minority, the protest is set to begin on Saturday at Dawson College and end at the offices of Quebec Prime Minister Francois Lego in Montreal.

Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia, representing Montreal’s most experienced riders, spoke out against the 96th bill in an interview on Friday. He added that it is “very probable” to participate in the rally to be held on Saturday.

“It’s not a consensus bill. The Quebec Board of Employers is very concerned about its impact. “What I want is Quebec, which is strong, which can move forward, which has a strong economy,” he said.

Brossard-St-Lambert MP Alexandra Mendes said she could not take part in the protest, but added that she supported “most of the demands of Quebec’s English-speaking communities”.

Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia, who represents the most professional riders on the island of Montreal, opposed the 96th bill. (Justin Tang / Canadian Press)

Հ Kotrakis confirmed that the deputies would march against the 96th bill. The offices of the other MPs, who are expected to join the march, did not respond to requests for approval.

Quebec’s “historic responsibilities”

In Quebec, French Minister for Languages ​​Simon Jolin-Barrett vigorously defended the 96th bill in the face of criticism from English-speaking groups and indigenous communities.

His office said the defense of the French language should take place in Quebec first.

Simon Jollen-Barrett, the minister responsible for the French Charter, says there are no plans to exempt native students from the requirement to take French language courses. (Frederick Bisonet / Radio Canada)

“The protection, improvement and promotion of the French language are the historic responsibilities of the Government of Quebec, and we fully intend to continue to do so,” said Elizabeth Gosselin-Bienvenu, Jolie-Barrett’s spokeswoman.

“Elected representatives of the Quebec nation must discuss the 96th bill.”

Bill 96, introduced a year ago, would make several changes to the 1977 French Language Charter (also known as Bill 101), strengthening the status of French in “all spheres of society.”

To make French the “official և common language of Quebec”, the government will impose new obligations on the use of French in companies with 25 to 49 employees. It will oversee access to English colleges, and regulate interactions between citizens and businesses of the Government of Quebec in a language other than French.

Open letter

The House’s father, who represents Mount Royal Riding, criticized several elements of the 96th bill last year, including the fact that it restricts access to government services in English.

“Suddenly, hundreds of thousands of people who considered themselves part of Quebec’s English-speaking community were no longer entitled to certain services in English by the state,” he said.

He also criticized the fact that Quebec had taken precautionary measures against the repealed clause, which would limit the possibility of a legal dispute.

“The idea of ​​protecting the bill from possible legal challenges is deeply troubling. “The public will have no way of finding out if the right has been violated,” Housefather said.

He said he was also preparing an open letter against the 96th bill, which would be published after the Quebec National Assembly passes the 96th bill. The state legislature will take a break next week and resume its session on May 24.

‘The accuracy or reliability of any information/material/calculation contained in this article is not guaranteed. This information has been brought to you by collecting from various mediums / astrologers / almanacs / discourses / beliefs / scriptures. Our purpose is only to deliver information, its users should take it as mere information. In addition, any use thereof shall be the responsibility of the user himself.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Translate »