Twitter has fired two of its top executives over ongoing controversy over Elon Musk’s acquisition of the company.
On Twitter, General Manager Kevin Baker announced on Thursday that he leaving the company seven years later, claiming that CEO Parag Agraval “asked me to leave after he informed me that he wanted to take the team in another direction.”
“I hope the best days of Twitter are still ahead, and with the right nutrition and care, that impact will only grow,” Baker added.
In addition, Bruce Falk, the leader of Twitter’s revenue product, was fired. Similarly, Falk responded: Through Twitter, where he thanked his former colleagues, he added that he “can not wait” to see what the company is building.
Agarwal overcame the steps a series of tweets On Thursday, he tried to address the question of why “a lame CEO would make these changes” if the company was on the verge of acquiring Musk.
“While I expect the deal to end, we need to be prepared for all the scenarios and always do what is right for Twitter. “I am responsible for running and running Twitter. Our task is to build a stronger Twitter every day.” .
“Regardless of the future ownership of the company, we are improving Twitter here as a product և for business clients, partners, shareholders և all of you.”
Meanwhile, Musk warned his followers On Sunday, the news that Twitter legal had just called to complain that I had violated their NDA by revealing that the bot’s sample size was 100. This is what really happened. ”
Musk has previously been linked to a story in tweets Reuters: According to the report, Twitter estimated that fake or spam accounts accounted for less than 5% of its daily active users subject to monetization in the first quarter.
The billionaire did it again! noting that the Twitter deal “He was temporarily suspended, waiting for details to support the calculation that spam / fake accounts actually represent less than 5% of users,” before claiming in the next tweet that he was still committed to the acquisition.
Musk then announced how his team would evaluate the assessment, claiming that they would make a “random sample of 100 followers” before inviting others to “repeat the same process to see what they found.”
see secret product in Box below
‘The accuracy or reliability of any information/material/calculation contained in this article is not guaranteed. This information has been brought to you by collecting from various mediums / astrologers / almanacs / discourses / beliefs / scriptures. Our purpose is only to deliver information, its users should take it as mere information. In addition, any use thereof shall be the responsibility of the user himself.’