SANTA FE, NM – A film company is challenging sanctions against New Mexico officials for alleged workplace safety violations. Rust:where actor-producer Alex Baldwin fired deadly shots at a cameraman in October, according to documents released Wednesday by state regulators.
Rust Movie Productions is: challenging the $ 137,000 fine by the state regulators of labor safety against the company, who say that the production managers did not follow the standard industrial protocols for firearms safety in the shooting area of the Western film.
On October 21, 2021, at a ranch on the outskirts of Santa Fe, Baldwin fired a shot at cinematographer Halina Hutchins inside a small church while filming a scene where it began killing Hutchins and insulting director Joel. Souza.
In an interview with ABC News in December, Baldwin said he aimed his shotgun at Hutchins when he turned it off without pulling on the trigger.
“The law properly allows producers to delegate important functions such as firearms safety to experts in the field; it does not place such responsibility on producers whose experience is related to the financing of filming and the signing of contracts,” it said. Application by Rust Movie Productions. “The company did not ‘intentionally’ violate any security protocol; in fact, it applied all applicable security protocols.”
In April, the New Mexico և Occupational Safety and Health Bureau imposed a maximum fine on Rust Movie Productions, spreading a strong history of security breaches, including evidence that production managers did little or nothing to eliminate the two fatal shots before the fatal exit. : shots.
The bureau also documented complaints from staff about gun safety that went unnoticed, saying that weapons experts were not allowed to make decisions about additional security training.
Rust Movie Productions responded to the request by saying that before the deadly shooting of the Hatchins, the wrong shots did not violate the security protocols, that “appropriate corrective actions were taken, including briefings of the actors and crew.”
“In fact, a security meeting took place on the morning of the incident,” the company said, apparently referring to the Hutchins shootings. The lawsuit is not detailed anymore.
Rust Movie Productions also disputes allegations that the film’s armored Hannah Gutierrez Reed was overwhelmed, claiming that she had enough time to properly inspect and protect all firearms and ammunition on the set. The production company quotes the costume designer as saying that Reed “had a lot of time” to do his job properly.
Guttierez Reed says state investigators have limited him to eight paid days as an armored technician to oversee weapons, drills, and more lightly assigned auxiliary duties. When his armor ran out, Gutierrez Reed warned the manager and was turned down.
The sheriff, who is investigating the shooting of the fateful film, described the disorganization and ignored the security measures when making the low-budget film. Santa Fe County Sheriff Adan Mendoza said he was waiting for a forensic examination of the weapon, projectile, fingerprints, etc. from the FBI and state medical experts before handing the case over to the prosecutor to decide whether to prosecute.
State revelations Rust Sanctions against Rust Movie Productions have affected at least five shooting lawsuits, including the illegal death lawsuit filed by the Hutchins’s family against other Baldwin պրո producers.
A lawsuit filed by Widow Matt Hutchins on behalf of his 9-year-old son alleges that “security” complaints about the shooting were “absurdly ignored.”
The state fines would apply to a film with a budget of about $ 7 million. Baldwin was paid $ 250,000 as an actor-producer, and may have returned some of that money to production.
Rust Movie Productions said in a statement that all crews on the set had been instructed to stop operating at any time until safety issues were resolved, and filmmakers were in place to ensure compliance with union safety protocols.
see secret product in Box below
‘The accuracy or reliability of any information/material/calculation contained in this article is not guaranteed. This information has been brought to you by collecting from various mediums / astrologers / almanacs / discourses / beliefs / scriptures. Our purpose is only to deliver information, its users should take it as mere information. In addition, any use thereof shall be the responsibility of the user himself.’