The site, which developed youth hockey in the United States and Canada, has partially ranked thousands of teams in the two countries on a weekly basis, announcing it is ending its practice at the youngest level of competition.
Neil Lodin, Founder of MYHockey Rankings says on its website On Wednesday, the platform will no longer provide digital rankings to teams of children under 11, explaining that the ratings have contributed to an unhealthy adult approach to play.
“Youth sport has become a rat race between parents, coaches and clubs,” Lodin wrote. “There is the following. “If you do not back the Jones family, do you even love your child?” thinking there.
“The youth hockey community is not free from these problems,” his message reads. “And let’s be honest, ratings are a contributing factor when they are used in a negative, excluding way, not as a planning tool, a planning resource.”
In December 2021, MYHockey Rankings և its impact were the topic Article: In The New York Times. Ken Martel, director of player development for the U.S. hockey body, says in the article that he fears that the weight given to the ratings of some parents and coaches by youth hockey associations will have a detrimental effect on the value of players զարգացման playing. the game.
The website’s ability to collect and compress statistics for thousands of teams between the ages of 9 and 18 has made it an indispensable resource for many in the youth hockey community.
It is based on a sophisticated algorithm that predicts a team’s “performance rating” – the difference in goals in any game they can play against any opponent in the database. Coaches տնօրեն Tournaments regularly use the website to identify teams that are supposed to match evenly և Schedule games accordingly.
Critics, however, argue that the website’s auxiliary practice of giving teams digital ratings has given many youth hockey stakeholders a primary instinct to climb the rankings endlessly in a single game.
In an interview, Lodin said the site would continue to provide key data to help with schedule decisions, such as win-loss records, game results, and other statistics, while lowering the rankings of its youngest teams. The site ranked about 3,000 teams of children under 11 during the last hockey season.
“We are taking steps that we believe make it more likely for users to use the site as intended as a tool to help teams plan the right level of competition as opposed to hockey damage,” Lodin said.
Tom Farry, executive director of the Aspen Institute’s Sports and Society Program, to whom Lodin attributed the idea of getting rid of the rankings, while maintaining the data that helps teams find relevant competition, called the move a “step in the right direction.” »:
“It sends the message that development is more powerful than comparing children to teams that are still in the early stages of development,” Farri said.
US hockey player Martel welcomed the development.
“This, I hope, will ease the pressure a little bit,” he said. “We are a late-developing sport. The best young children are no longer the best children. Nobody knows who is really good before puberty. ”
see secret product in Box below
‘The accuracy or reliability of any information/material/calculation contained in this article is not guaranteed. This information has been brought to you by collecting from various mediums / astrologers / almanacs / discourses / beliefs / scriptures. Our purpose is only to deliver information, its users should take it as mere information. In addition, any use thereof shall be the responsibility of the user himself.’